GLM-5.3 (Low) vs Solar Pro 3
Which is better for the money: GLM-5.3 (Low) by Z AI or Solar Pro 3 by Upstage? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
GLM-5.3 (Low) scores 26.5 points higher (34.3 vs 7.8) but costs 6.4× as much to run the benchmark ($1013 vs $159; premium vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick GLM-5.3 (Low) when you need intelligence above 7.8, and Solar Pro 3 when 7.8 is enough.
| Metric | GLM-5.3 (Low) | Solar Pro 3 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 34.3 | 7.8 | −77.3% Solar Pro 3 is 77.3% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $1,012.50 | $159.22 | −84.3% Solar Pro 3 is 84.3% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 31.17s | 18.89s | −39.4% Solar Pro 3 is 39.4% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $1.40 / $4.40 | $0.15 / $0.60 | |
| Input modalities | Text | Text |
Solar Pro 3 vs GLM-5.3 (Low): 77.3% less intelligence, 84.3% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 39.4% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GLM-5.3 (Low) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) scores 51.00 for $662.
- Solar Pro 3 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Haiku 5.5 (Xhigh) scores 41.20 for $158.
GLM-5.3 (Low)Solar Pro 3Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/glm-5-3-low/solar-pro-3 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/glm-5-3-low/solar-pro-3?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill