GLM-5.3 (Max) vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro
Which is better for the money: GLM-5.3 (Max) by Z AI or MiMo-V2.6-Pro by Xiaomi? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick MiMo-V2.6-Pro
MiMo-V2.6-Pro vs GLM-5.3 (Max): 3.3% more intelligence, 91.7% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 52.8% slower end-to-end.
| Metric | GLM-5.3 (Max) | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 44.8 | 46.3 | +3.3% MiMo-V2.6-Pro is 3.3% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $2,503.48 | $206.66 | −91.7% MiMo-V2.6-Pro is 91.7% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 31.61s | 48.29s | +52.8% MiMo-V2.6-Pro is 52.8% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $1.40 / $4.40 | $0.43 / $0.87 | |
| Input modalities | Text | Text, Image, Speech, Video |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GLM-5.3 (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Opus 5.5 (High, Default Fallback) scores 53.60 for $2172.
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
GLM-5.3 (Max)MiMo-V2.6-ProToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/glm-5-3/mimo-v2-6-pro · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/glm-5-3/mimo-v2-6-pro?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill