GPT-5.4 mini (Xhigh) vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
Which is better for the money: GPT-5.4 mini (Xhigh) by OpenAI or MiniMax-M3.1-Flash by MiniMax? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
MiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs GPT-5.4 mini (Xhigh): 77.2% more intelligence, 81.4% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 78.4% faster end-to-end.
| Metric | GPT-5.4 mini (Xhigh) | MiniMax-M3.1-Flash | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 24.1 | 42.7 | +77.2% MiniMax-M3.1-Flash is 77.2% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $1,524.02 | $283.18 | −81.4% MiniMax-M3.1-Flash is 81.4% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 109.06s | 23.52s | −78.4% MiniMax-M3.1-Flash is 78.4% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.75 / $4.50 | $0.15 / $0.60 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-5.4 mini (Xhigh) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
- MiniMax-M3.1-Flash is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
GPT-5.4 mini (Xhigh)MiniMax-M3.1-FlashToday's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-5-4-mini/minimax-m3-1-flash · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-5-4-mini/minimax-m3-1-flash?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill