GPT-5.4 nano (Xhigh) vs gpt-oss-120b (High)
Which is better for the money: GPT-5.4 nano (Xhigh) by OpenAI or gpt-oss-120b (High) by OpenAI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-26.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
GPT-5.4 nano (Xhigh) scores 9.1 points higher (20.7 vs 11.6) but costs 2.7× as much to run the benchmark ($331 vs $123; both mid-range class). Pick GPT-5.4 nano (Xhigh) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise gpt-oss-120b (High).
| Metric | GPT-5.4 nano (Xhigh) | gpt-oss-120b (High) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 20.7 | 11.6 | −44.0% gpt-oss-120b (High) is 44.0% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $331.24 | $122.71 | −63.0% gpt-oss-120b (High) is 63.0% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 93.46s | 11.28s | −87.9% gpt-oss-120b (High) is 87.9% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.20 / $1.25 | $0.15 / $0.60 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text |
gpt-oss-120b (High) vs GPT-5.4 nano (Xhigh): 44.0% less intelligence, 63.0% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 87.9% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-5.4 nano (Xhigh) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
- gpt-oss-120b (High) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Max) scores 38.10 for $122.
GPT-5.4 nano (Xhigh)gpt-oss-120b (High)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-5-4-nano/gpt-oss-120b · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-5-4-nano/gpt-oss-120b?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill