GPT-5.4 nano (Xhigh) vs Inkling Small
Which is better for the money: GPT-5.4 nano (Xhigh) by OpenAI or Inkling Small by Thinking Machines? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick Inkling Small
Inkling Small vs GPT-5.4 nano (Xhigh): 24.2% more intelligence, 27.3% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 77.6% faster end-to-end.
| Metric | GPT-5.4 nano (Xhigh) | Inkling Small | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 20.7 | 25.7 | +24.2% Inkling Small is 24.2% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $331.24 | $240.85 | −27.3% Inkling Small is 27.3% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 57.18s | 12.80s | −77.6% Inkling Small is 77.6% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.20 / $1.25 | $0.30 / $1.20 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image, Speech |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-5.4 nano (Xhigh) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
- Inkling Small is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
GPT-5.4 nano (Xhigh)Inkling SmallToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-5-4-nano/inkling-small · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-5-4-nano/inkling-small?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill