GPT-5.5 (High) vs Muse Wonder (Max)
Which is better for the money: GPT-5.5 (High) by OpenAI or Muse Wonder (Max) by Meta? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Muse Wonder (Max) scores 15.4 points higher (52.4 vs 37.0) but costs 1.7× as much to run the benchmark ($5787 vs $3411; both flagship class). Pick Muse Wonder (Max) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise GPT-5.5 (High).
| Metric | GPT-5.5 (High) | Muse Wonder (Max) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 37.0 | 52.4 | +41.6% Muse Wonder (Max) is 41.6% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $3,410.76 | $5,786.78 | +69.7% Muse Wonder (Max) is 69.7% more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 19.56s | 43.73s | +123.6% Muse Wonder (Max) is 123.6% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $5.00 / $30.0 | $4.00 / $20.0 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image, Speech, Video |
Muse Wonder (Max) vs GPT-5.5 (High): 41.6% more intelligence, 69.7% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 123.6% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-5.5 (High) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Kimi K3.1 Pro scores 55.10 for $3117.
- Muse Wonder (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Opus 5.5 (Xhigh, Default Fallback) scores 56.00 for $4057.
GPT-5.5 (High)Muse Wonder (Max)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-5-5-high/muse-wonder · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-5-5-high/muse-wonder?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill