GPT-5.6 Luna (High) vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
Which is better for the money: GPT-5.6 Luna (High) by OpenAI or MiniMax-M3.1-Flash by MiniMax? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-27.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
MiniMax-M3.1-Flash scores 10.6 points higher (42.7 vs 32.1) but costs 2.6× as much to run the benchmark ($283 vs $108; both mid-range class). Pick MiniMax-M3.1-Flash when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise GPT-5.6 Luna (High).
| Metric | GPT-5.6 Luna (High) | MiniMax-M3.1-Flash | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 32.1 | 42.7 | +33.0% MiniMax-M3.1-Flash is 33.0% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $108.15 | $283.18 | +161.8% MiniMax-M3.1-Flash is 2.6× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 16.69s | 22.27s | +33.4% MiniMax-M3.1-Flash is 33.4% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.20 / $1.20 | $0.15 / $0.60 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
MiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs GPT-5.6 Luna (High): 33.0% more intelligence, 161.8% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 33.4% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-5.6 Luna (High) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Haiku 5.5 (High) scores 37.80 for $94.1.
- MiniMax-M3.1-Flash is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
GPT-5.6 Luna (High)MiniMax-M3.1-FlashToday's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-5-6-luna-high/minimax-m3-1-flash · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-5-6-luna-high/minimax-m3-1-flash?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill