GPT-5.6 Luna (High) vs Qwen3 Coder Next
Which is better for the money: GPT-5.6 Luna (High) by OpenAI or Qwen3 Coder Next by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick GPT-5.6 Luna (High)
Qwen3 Coder Next vs GPT-5.6 Luna (High): 71.3% less intelligence, 274.6% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 49.6% faster end-to-end.
| Metric | GPT-5.6 Luna (High) | Qwen3 Coder Next | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 32.1 | 9.2 | −71.3% Qwen3 Coder Next is 71.3% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $108.15 | $405.10 | +274.6% Qwen3 Coder Next is 3.7× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 12.33s | 6.21s | −49.6% Qwen3 Coder Next is 49.6% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.20 / $1.20 | $0.31 / $1.00 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-5.6 Luna (High) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Haiku 5.5 (High) scores 37.80 for $94.1.
- Qwen3 Coder Next is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium) scores 47.80 for $361.
GPT-5.6 Luna (High)Qwen3 Coder NextToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-5-6-luna-high/qwen3-coder-next · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-5-6-luna-high/qwen3-coder-next?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill