GPT-5.6 Luna (Low) vs Qwen3.8 Max
Which is better for the money: GPT-5.6 Luna (Low) by OpenAI or Qwen3.8 Max by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-26.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Qwen3.8 Max scores 19.2 points higher (40.2 vs 21.0) but costs 117× as much to run the benchmark ($3172 vs $27.0; flagship vs budget cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Qwen3.8 Max when you need intelligence above 21.0, and GPT-5.6 Luna (Low) when 21.0 is enough.
| Metric | GPT-5.6 Luna (Low) | Qwen3.8 Max | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 21.0 | 40.2 | +91.4% Qwen3.8 Max is 91.4% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $27.02 | $3,172.37 | +11640.8% Qwen3.8 Max is 117× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 5.78s | 63.35s | +996.0% Qwen3.8 Max is 996.0% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.20 / $1.20 | $2.00 / $6.00 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image, Video |
Qwen3.8 Max vs GPT-5.6 Luna (Low): 91.4% more intelligence, 11640.8% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 996.0% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-5.6 Luna (Low) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Low) scores 21.50 for $10.6.
- Qwen3.8 Max is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Kimi K3.1 Pro scores 55.10 for $3117.
GPT-5.6 Luna (Low)Qwen3.8 MaxToday's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-5-6-luna-low/qwen3-8-max-0803 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-5-6-luna-low/qwen3-8-max-0803?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill