GPT-5.6 Luna (Medium) vs Hy3
Which is better for the money: GPT-5.6 Luna (Medium) by OpenAI or Hy3 by Tencent? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Hy3 scores 0.3 points higher (25.3 vs 25.0) but costs 3.4× as much to run the benchmark ($150 vs $44.3; mid-range vs budget cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Hy3 when you need intelligence above 25.0, and GPT-5.6 Luna (Medium) when 25.0 is enough.
| Metric | GPT-5.6 Luna (Medium) | Hy3 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 25.0 | 25.3 | +1.2% Hy3 is 1.2% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $44.32 | $149.61 | +237.6% Hy3 is 3.4× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 6.14s | 33.73s | +449.3% Hy3 is 449.3% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.20 / $1.20 | $0.14 / $0.56 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text |
Hy3 vs GPT-5.6 Luna (Medium): 1.2% more intelligence, 237.6% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 449.3% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-5.6 Luna (Medium) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Medium) scores 29.90 for $31.2.
- Hy3 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Max) scores 38.10 for $122.
GPT-5.6 Luna (Medium)Hy3Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-5-6-luna-medium/hy3 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-5-6-luna-medium/hy3?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill