GPT-5.6 Luna (Max) vs Beam 1.0
Which is better for the money: GPT-5.6 Luna (Max) by OpenAI or Beam 1.0 by Reflection? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
GPT-5.6 Luna (Max) scores 7.0 points higher (37.3 vs 30.3) but costs 1.0× as much to run the benchmark ($320 vs $319; both mid-range class). Pick GPT-5.6 Luna (Max) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Beam 1.0.
| Metric | GPT-5.6 Luna (Max) | Beam 1.0 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 37.3 | 30.3 | −18.8% Beam 1.0 is 18.8% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $319.93 | $318.73 | −0.4% Beam 1.0 is 0.4% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 85.38s | 8.02s | −90.6% Beam 1.0 is 90.6% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.20 / $1.20 | $0.40 / $1.20 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text |
Beam 1.0 vs GPT-5.6 Luna (Max): 18.8% less intelligence, 0.4% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 90.6% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-5.6 Luna (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
- Beam 1.0 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
GPT-5.6 Luna (Max)Beam 1.0Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-5-6-luna/reflection-beam · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-5-6-luna/reflection-beam?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill