GPT-5.6 Sol (Low) vs Grok 4.7 (High)
Which is better for the money: GPT-5.6 Sol (Low) by OpenAI or Grok 4.7 (High) by SpaceXAI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Grok 4.7 (High) scores 12.8 points higher (46.3 vs 33.5) but costs 6.1× as much to run the benchmark ($3881 vs $637; flagship vs premium cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Grok 4.7 (High) when you need intelligence above 33.5, and GPT-5.6 Sol (Low) when 33.5 is enough.
| Metric | GPT-5.6 Sol (Low) | Grok 4.7 (High) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 33.5 | 46.3 | +38.2% Grok 4.7 (High) is 38.2% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $637.28 | $3,880.88 | +509.0% Grok 4.7 (High) is 6.1× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 8.17s | 25.34s | +210.2% Grok 4.7 (High) is 210.2% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $4.00 / $20.0 | $2.00 / $6.00 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Grok 4.7 (High) vs GPT-5.6 Sol (Low): 38.2% more intelligence, 509.0% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 210.2% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-5.6 Sol (Low) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (High) scores 50.20 for $521.
- Grok 4.7 (High) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Kimi K3.1 Pro scores 55.10 for $3117.
GPT-5.6 Sol (Low)Grok 4.7 (High)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-5-6-sol-low/grok-4-7-high · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-5-6-sol-low/grok-4-7-high?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill