GPT-5.6 Sol (Low) vs Qwen3.7 Plus
Which is better for the money: GPT-5.6 Sol (Low) by OpenAI or Qwen3.7 Plus by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
GPT-5.6 Sol (Low) scores 8.3 points higher (33.5 vs 25.2) but costs 1.5× as much to run the benchmark ($637 vs $428; premium vs mid-range cost classes). Pick GPT-5.6 Sol (Low) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Qwen3.7 Plus.
| Metric | GPT-5.6 Sol (Low) | Qwen3.7 Plus | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 33.5 | 25.2 | −24.8% Qwen3.7 Plus is 24.8% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $637.28 | $427.73 | −32.9% Qwen3.7 Plus is 32.9% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 8.26s | 45.52s | +451.1% Qwen3.7 Plus is 451.1% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $4.00 / $20.0 | $0.40 / $1.60 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image, Video |
Qwen3.7 Plus vs GPT-5.6 Sol (Low): 24.8% less intelligence, 32.9% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 451.1% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-5.6 Sol (Low) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (High) scores 50.20 for $521.
- Qwen3.7 Plus is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium) scores 47.80 for $361.
GPT-5.6 Sol (Low)Qwen3.7 PlusToday's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-5-6-sol-low/qwen3-7-plus · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-5-6-sol-low/qwen3-7-plus?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill