GPT-5.6 Sol (Max) vs Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B
Which is better for the money: GPT-5.6 Sol (Max) by OpenAI or Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-27.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
GPT-5.6 Sol (Max) scores 7.1 points higher (47.0 vs 39.9) but costs 1.3× as much to run the benchmark ($3465 vs $2632; both flagship class). Pick GPT-5.6 Sol (Max) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B.
| Metric | GPT-5.6 Sol (Max) | Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 47.0 | 39.9 | −15.1% Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B is 15.1% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $3,464.84 | $2,632.05 | −24.0% Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B is 24.0% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 112.22s | 63.76s | −43.2% Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B is 43.2% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $4.00 / $20.0 | $2.00 / $6.00 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text |
Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B vs GPT-5.6 Sol (Max): 15.1% less intelligence, 24.0% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 43.2% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-5.6 Sol (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Kimi K3.1 Pro scores 55.10 for $3117.
- Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Opus 5.5 (High, Default Fallback) scores 53.60 for $2172.
GPT-5.6 Sol (Max)Qwen3.8 2.4T A95BToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-5-6-sol/qwen3-8-2-4t-a95b · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-5-6-sol/qwen3-8-2-4t-a95b?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill