GPT-5.6 Terra (High) vs Qwen3 Coder Next
Which is better for the money: GPT-5.6 Terra (High) by OpenAI or Qwen3 Coder Next by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
GPT-5.6 Terra (High) scores 25.0 points higher (34.2 vs 9.2) but costs 1.9× as much to run the benchmark ($768 vs $405; premium vs mid-range cost classes). Pick GPT-5.6 Terra (High) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Qwen3 Coder Next.
| Metric | GPT-5.6 Terra (High) | Qwen3 Coder Next | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 34.2 | 9.2 | −73.1% Qwen3 Coder Next is 73.1% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $767.78 | $405.10 | −47.2% Qwen3 Coder Next is 47.2% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 6.60s | 6.21s | −5.9% Qwen3 Coder Next is 5.9% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $2.00 / $12.0 | $0.31 / $1.00 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text |
Qwen3 Coder Next vs GPT-5.6 Terra (High): 73.1% less intelligence, 47.2% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 5.9% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-5.6 Terra (High) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) scores 51.00 for $662.
- Qwen3 Coder Next is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium) scores 47.80 for $361.
GPT-5.6 Terra (High)Qwen3 Coder NextToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-5-6-terra-high/qwen3-coder-next · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-5-6-terra-high/qwen3-coder-next?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill