GPT-5.6 Terra (Max) vs Qwen3.7 Max
Which is better for the money: GPT-5.6 Terra (Max) by OpenAI or Qwen3.7 Max by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-26.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
GPT-5.6 Terra (Max) scores 12.6 points higher (42.1 vs 29.5) but costs 1.1× as much to run the benchmark ($2501 vs $2277; both flagship class). Pick GPT-5.6 Terra (Max) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Qwen3.7 Max.
| Metric | GPT-5.6 Terra (Max) | Qwen3.7 Max | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 42.1 | 29.5 | −29.9% Qwen3.7 Max is 29.9% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $2,500.72 | $2,277.12 | −8.9% Qwen3.7 Max is 8.9% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 110.99s | 16.64s | −85.0% Qwen3.7 Max is 85.0% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $2.00 / $12.0 | $2.50 / $7.50 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text |
Qwen3.7 Max vs GPT-5.6 Terra (Max): 29.9% less intelligence, 8.9% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 85.0% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-5.6 Terra (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Opus 5.5 (High, Default Fallback) scores 53.60 for $2172.
- Qwen3.7 Max is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Opus 5.5 (High, Default Fallback) scores 53.60 for $2172.
GPT-5.6 Terra (Max)Qwen3.7 MaxToday's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-5-6-terra/qwen3-7-max · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-5-6-terra/qwen3-7-max?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill