GPT-5 mini (High) vs GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium)
Which is better for the money: GPT-5 mini (High) by OpenAI or GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium) by OpenAI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium) scores 31.0 points higher (47.8 vs 16.8) but costs 1.9× as much to run the benchmark ($361 vs $189; both mid-range class). Pick GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise GPT-5 mini (High).
| Metric | GPT-5 mini (High) | GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 16.8 | 47.8 | +184.5% GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium) is 2.8× more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $188.66 | $361.37 | +91.5% GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium) is 91.5% more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 58.72s | 14.35s | −75.6% GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium) is 75.6% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.25 / $2.00 | $2.00 / $10.0 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium) vs GPT-5 mini (High): 184.5% more intelligence, 91.5% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 75.6% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-5 mini (High) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Haiku 5.5 (Xhigh) scores 41.20 for $158.
- GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium) is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
GPT-5 mini (High)GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-5-mini/gpt-6-1-sol-medium · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-5-mini/gpt-6-1-sol-medium?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill