GPT-6.1 Sol (High) vs Solar Pro 3
Which is better for the money: GPT-6.1 Sol (High) by OpenAI or Solar Pro 3 by Upstage? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
GPT-6.1 Sol (High) scores 42.4 points higher (50.2 vs 7.8) but costs 3.3× as much to run the benchmark ($521 vs $159; premium vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick GPT-6.1 Sol (High) when you need intelligence above 7.8, and Solar Pro 3 when 7.8 is enough.
| Metric | GPT-6.1 Sol (High) | Solar Pro 3 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 50.2 | 7.8 | −84.5% Solar Pro 3 is 84.5% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $521.32 | $159.22 | −69.5% Solar Pro 3 is 69.5% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 43.44s | 18.94s | −56.4% Solar Pro 3 is 56.4% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $2.00 / $10.0 | $0.15 / $0.60 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text |
Solar Pro 3 vs GPT-6.1 Sol (High): 84.5% less intelligence, 69.5% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 56.4% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-6.1 Sol (High) is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
- Solar Pro 3 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Haiku 5.5 (Xhigh) scores 41.20 for $158.
GPT-6.1 Sol (High)Solar Pro 3Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-1-sol-high/solar-pro-3 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-1-sol-high/solar-pro-3?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill