GPT-6.1 Sol (Low) vs Granite 4.2 30B
Which is better for the money: GPT-6.1 Sol (Low) by OpenAI or Granite 4.2 30B by IBM? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-26.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
GPT-6.1 Sol (Low) scores 29.4 points higher (42.1 vs 12.7) but costs 2.3× as much to run the benchmark ($250 vs $111; both mid-range class). Pick GPT-6.1 Sol (Low) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Granite 4.2 30B.
| Metric | GPT-6.1 Sol (Low) | Granite 4.2 30B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 42.1 | 12.7 | −69.8% Granite 4.2 30B is 69.8% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $250.48 | $110.83 | −55.8% Granite 4.2 30B is 55.8% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 12.25s | 57.71s | +371.1% Granite 4.2 30B is 371.1% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $2.00 / $10.0 | $0.16 / $0.65 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text |
Granite 4.2 30B vs GPT-6.1 Sol (Low): 69.8% less intelligence, 55.8% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 371.1% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-6.1 Sol (Low) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
- Granite 4.2 30B is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Flash scores 37.90 for $110.
GPT-6.1 Sol (Low)Granite 4.2 30BToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-1-sol-low/granite-4-2-30b · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-1-sol-low/granite-4-2-30b?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill