GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium) vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
Which is better for the money: GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium) by OpenAI or MiniMax-M3.1-Flash by MiniMax? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium) scores 5.1 points higher (47.8 vs 42.7) but costs 1.3× as much to run the benchmark ($361 vs $283; both mid-range class). Pick GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise MiniMax-M3.1-Flash.
| Metric | GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium) | MiniMax-M3.1-Flash | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 47.8 | 42.7 | −10.7% MiniMax-M3.1-Flash is 10.7% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $361.37 | $283.18 | −21.6% MiniMax-M3.1-Flash is 21.6% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 14.35s | 25.34s | +76.6% MiniMax-M3.1-Flash is 76.6% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $2.00 / $10.0 | $0.15 / $0.60 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
MiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium): 10.7% less intelligence, 21.6% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 76.6% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium) is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
- MiniMax-M3.1-Flash is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium)MiniMax-M3.1-FlashToday's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-1-sol-medium/minimax-m3-1-flash · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-1-sol-medium/minimax-m3-1-flash?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill