GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium) vs Muse Spark 1.3 (Max)
Which is better for the money: GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium) by OpenAI or Muse Spark 1.3 (Max) by Meta? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Muse Spark 1.3 (Max) scores 0.3 points higher (48.1 vs 47.8) but costs 5.5× as much to run the benchmark ($2000 vs $361; flagship vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Muse Spark 1.3 (Max) when you need intelligence above 47.8, and GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium) when 47.8 is enough.
| Metric | GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium) | Muse Spark 1.3 (Max) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 47.8 | 48.1 | +0.6% Muse Spark 1.3 (Max) is 0.6% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $361.37 | $2,000.35 | +453.5% Muse Spark 1.3 (Max) is 5.5× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 13.60s | 67.10s | +393.4% Muse Spark 1.3 (Max) is 393.4% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $2.00 / $10.0 | $1.25 / $4.25 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image, Video |
Muse Spark 1.3 (Max) vs GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium): 0.6% more intelligence, 453.5% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 393.4% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium) is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
- Muse Spark 1.3 (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium)Muse Spark 1.3 (Max)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-1-sol-medium/muse-spark-1-3 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-1-sol-medium/muse-spark-1-3?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill