GPT-6.1 Terra (High) vs Muse Ember (Xhigh)
Which is better for the money: GPT-6.1 Terra (High) by OpenAI or Muse Ember (Xhigh) by Meta? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-11-10.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
GPT-6.1 Terra (High) scores 8.3 points higher (42.4 vs 34.1) but costs 2.8× as much to run the benchmark ($267 vs $95.7; both mid-range class). Pick GPT-6.1 Terra (High) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Muse Ember (Xhigh).
| Metric | GPT-6.1 Terra (High) | Muse Ember (Xhigh) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 42.4 | 34.1 | −19.6% Muse Ember (Xhigh) is 19.6% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $266.79 | $95.73 | −64.1% Muse Ember (Xhigh) is 64.1% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 26.18s | 7.89s | −69.9% Muse Ember (Xhigh) is 69.9% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $1.00 / $5.00 | $0.10 / $0.50 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Muse Ember (Xhigh) vs GPT-6.1 Terra (High): 19.6% less intelligence, 64.1% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 69.9% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-6.1 Terra (High) is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
- Muse Ember (Xhigh) is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
GPT-6.1 Terra (High)Muse Ember (Xhigh)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-1-terra-high/muse-ember-xhigh · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-1-terra-high/muse-ember-xhigh?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill