GPT-6.1 Terra (High) vs Muse Glimmer (High)
Which is better for the money: GPT-6.1 Terra (High) by OpenAI or Muse Glimmer (High) by Meta? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-27.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
GPT-6.1 Terra (High) scores 26.4 points higher (43.9 vs 17.5) but costs 1.6× as much to run the benchmark ($239 vs $146; both mid-range class). Pick GPT-6.1 Terra (High) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Muse Glimmer (High).
| Metric | GPT-6.1 Terra (High) | Muse Glimmer (High) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 43.9 | 17.5 | −60.1% Muse Glimmer (High) is 60.1% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $238.53 | $145.77 | −38.9% Muse Glimmer (High) is 38.9% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 11.16s | 24.42s | +118.8% Muse Glimmer (High) is 118.8% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $1.00 / $5.00 | $0.30 / $1.20 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Muse Glimmer (High) vs GPT-6.1 Terra (High): 60.1% less intelligence, 38.9% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 118.8% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-6.1 Terra (High) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
- Muse Glimmer (High) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Max) scores 38.10 for $122.
GPT-6.1 Terra (High)Muse Glimmer (High)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-1-terra-high/muse-glimmer · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-1-terra-high/muse-glimmer?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill