GPT-6.1 Terra (Low) vs GPT-6 Luna (Xhigh)
Which is better for the money: GPT-6.1 Terra (Low) by OpenAI or GPT-6 Luna (Xhigh) by OpenAI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-27.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
GPT-6.1 Terra (Low) scores 1.6 points higher (36.2 vs 34.6) but costs 1.7× as much to run the benchmark ($115 vs $66.8; both mid-range class). Pick GPT-6.1 Terra (Low) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise GPT-6 Luna (Xhigh).
| Metric | GPT-6.1 Terra (Low) | GPT-6 Luna (Xhigh) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 36.2 | 34.6 | −4.4% GPT-6 Luna (Xhigh) is 4.4% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $114.52 | $66.81 | −41.7% GPT-6 Luna (Xhigh) is 41.7% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 6.78s | 27.33s | +303.1% GPT-6 Luna (Xhigh) is 303.1% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $1.00 / $5.00 | $0.10 / $0.50 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
GPT-6 Luna (Xhigh) vs GPT-6.1 Terra (Low): 4.4% less intelligence, 41.7% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 303.1% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-6.1 Terra (Low) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Flash scores 37.90 for $110.
- GPT-6 Luna (Xhigh) is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
GPT-6.1 Terra (Low)GPT-6 Luna (Xhigh)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-1-terra-low/gpt-6-luna-xhigh · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-1-terra-low/gpt-6-luna-xhigh?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill