GPT-6.1 Terra (Low) vs Grok 4.7 (Xhigh)
Which is better for the money: GPT-6.1 Terra (Low) by OpenAI or Grok 4.7 (Xhigh) by SpaceXAI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-27.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Grok 4.7 (Xhigh) scores 10.2 points higher (46.4 vs 36.2) but costs 39× as much to run the benchmark ($4438 vs $115; flagship vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Grok 4.7 (Xhigh) when you need intelligence above 36.2, and GPT-6.1 Terra (Low) when 36.2 is enough.
| Metric | GPT-6.1 Terra (Low) | Grok 4.7 (Xhigh) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 36.2 | 46.4 | +28.2% Grok 4.7 (Xhigh) is 28.2% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $114.52 | $4,438.03 | +3775.3% Grok 4.7 (Xhigh) is 39× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 6.78s | 72.50s | +969.3% Grok 4.7 (Xhigh) is 969.3% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $1.00 / $5.00 | $2.00 / $6.00 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Grok 4.7 (Xhigh) vs GPT-6.1 Terra (Low): 28.2% more intelligence, 3775.3% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 969.3% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-6.1 Terra (Low) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Flash scores 37.90 for $110.
- Grok 4.7 (Xhigh) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Opus 5.5 (Xhigh, Default Fallback) scores 56.00 for $4057.
GPT-6.1 Terra (Low)Grok 4.7 (Xhigh)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-1-terra-low/grok-4-7 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-1-terra-low/grok-4-7?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill