GPT-6.1 Terra (Low) vs MiMo-V2.5
Which is better for the money: GPT-6.1 Terra (Low) by OpenAI or MiMo-V2.5 by Xiaomi? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-27.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
GPT-6.1 Terra (Low) scores 14.4 points higher (36.2 vs 21.8) but costs 1.7× as much to run the benchmark ($115 vs $66.1; both mid-range class). Pick GPT-6.1 Terra (Low) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise MiMo-V2.5.
| Metric | GPT-6.1 Terra (Low) | MiMo-V2.5 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 36.2 | 21.8 | −39.8% MiMo-V2.5 is 39.8% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $114.52 | $66.09 | −42.3% MiMo-V2.5 is 42.3% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 6.78s | 66.43s | +879.8% MiMo-V2.5 is 879.8% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $1.00 / $5.00 | $0.13 / $0.27 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
MiMo-V2.5 vs GPT-6.1 Terra (Low): 39.8% less intelligence, 42.3% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 879.8% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-6.1 Terra (Low) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Flash scores 37.90 for $110.
- MiMo-V2.5 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Haiku 5.5 (Medium) scores 34.50 for $56.4.
GPT-6.1 Terra (Low)MiMo-V2.5Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-1-terra-low/mimo-v2-5-0424 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-1-terra-low/mimo-v2-5-0424?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill