GPT-6.1 Terra (Low) vs Qwen3.8 27B (Xhigh)
Which is better for the money: GPT-6.1 Terra (Low) by OpenAI or Qwen3.8 27B (Xhigh) by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-27.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick GPT-6.1 Terra (Low)
Qwen3.8 27B (Xhigh) vs GPT-6.1 Terra (Low): 6.9% less intelligence, 1174.0% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 844.2% slower end-to-end.
| Metric | GPT-6.1 Terra (Low) | Qwen3.8 27B (Xhigh) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 36.2 | 33.7 | −6.9% Qwen3.8 27B (Xhigh) is 6.9% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $114.52 | $1,458.94 | +1174.0% Qwen3.8 27B (Xhigh) is 13× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 6.78s | 64.02s | +844.2% Qwen3.8 27B (Xhigh) is 844.2% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $1.00 / $5.00 | $0.50 / $3.00 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image, Video |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-6.1 Terra (Low) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Flash scores 37.90 for $110.
- Qwen3.8 27B (Xhigh) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
GPT-6.1 Terra (Low)Qwen3.8 27B (Xhigh)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-1-terra-low/qwen3-8-27b · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-1-terra-low/qwen3-8-27b?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill