GPT-6.1 Terra (Medium) vs Grok 4.7 (High)
Which is better for the money: GPT-6.1 Terra (Medium) by OpenAI or Grok 4.7 (High) by SpaceXAI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-27.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Grok 4.7 (High) scores 5.0 points higher (46.3 vs 41.3) but costs 20× as much to run the benchmark ($3473 vs $175; flagship vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Grok 4.7 (High) when you need intelligence above 41.3, and GPT-6.1 Terra (Medium) when 41.3 is enough.
| Metric | GPT-6.1 Terra (Medium) | Grok 4.7 (High) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 41.3 | 46.3 | +12.1% Grok 4.7 (High) is 12.1% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $175.20 | $3,473.49 | +1882.6% Grok 4.7 (High) is 20× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 6.95s | 51.23s | +637.1% Grok 4.7 (High) is 637.1% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $1.00 / $5.00 | $2.00 / $6.00 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Grok 4.7 (High) vs GPT-6.1 Terra (Medium): 12.1% more intelligence, 1882.6% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 637.1% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-6.1 Terra (Medium) is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
- Grok 4.7 (High) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Kimi K3.1 Pro scores 55.10 for $3117.
GPT-6.1 Terra (Medium)Grok 4.7 (High)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-1-terra-medium/grok-4-7-high · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-1-terra-medium/grok-4-7-high?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill