GPT-6.1 Terra (Medium) vs Ling 3.0 Flash
Which is better for the money: GPT-6.1 Terra (Medium) by OpenAI or Ling 3.0 Flash by InclusionAI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-27.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
GPT-6.1 Terra (Medium) scores 21.2 points higher (41.3 vs 20.1) but costs 2.0× as much to run the benchmark ($175 vs $89.8; both mid-range class). Pick GPT-6.1 Terra (Medium) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Ling 3.0 Flash.
| Metric | GPT-6.1 Terra (Medium) | Ling 3.0 Flash | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 41.3 | 20.1 | −51.3% Ling 3.0 Flash is 51.3% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $175.20 | $89.77 | −48.8% Ling 3.0 Flash is 48.8% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 7.35s | 12.67s | +72.4% Ling 3.0 Flash is 72.4% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $1.00 / $5.00 | $0.07 / $0.22 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text |
Ling 3.0 Flash vs GPT-6.1 Terra (Medium): 51.3% less intelligence, 48.8% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 72.4% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-6.1 Terra (Medium) is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
- Ling 3.0 Flash is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Xhigh) scores 34.60 for $66.8.
GPT-6.1 Terra (Medium)Ling 3.0 FlashToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-1-terra-medium/ling-3-0-flash · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-1-terra-medium/ling-3-0-flash?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill