GPT-6.1 Terra (Medium) vs Muse Ember (Max)
Which is better for the money: GPT-6.1 Terra (Medium) by OpenAI or Muse Ember (Max) by Meta? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-11-09.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
GPT-6.1 Terra (Medium) scores 2.2 points higher (38.2 vs 36.0) but costs 1.6× as much to run the benchmark ($190 vs $117; both mid-range class). Pick GPT-6.1 Terra (Medium) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Muse Ember (Max).
| Metric | GPT-6.1 Terra (Medium) | Muse Ember (Max) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 38.2 | 36.0 | −5.8% Muse Ember (Max) is 5.8% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $190.36 | $117.12 | −38.5% Muse Ember (Max) is 38.5% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 9.88s | Not reported | — not comparable |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $1.00 / $5.00 | $0.10 / $0.50 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Muse Ember (Max) vs GPT-6.1 Terra (Medium): 5.8% less intelligence, 38.5% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and end-to-end time not fully reported.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-6.1 Terra (Medium) is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
- Muse Ember (Max) is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
GPT-6.1 Terra (Medium)Muse Ember (Max)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-1-terra-medium/muse-ember · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-1-terra-medium/muse-ember?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill