GPT-6.1 Terra (Non-reasoning) vs Kimi K3.1 Pro
Which is better for the money: GPT-6.1 Terra (Non-reasoning) by OpenAI or Kimi K3.1 Pro by Kimi? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-27.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Kimi K3.1 Pro scores 21.6 points higher (55.1 vs 33.5) but costs 20× as much to run the benchmark ($3117 vs $154; flagship vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Kimi K3.1 Pro when you need intelligence above 33.5, and GPT-6.1 Terra (Non-reasoning) when 33.5 is enough.
| Metric | GPT-6.1 Terra (Non-reasoning) | Kimi K3.1 Pro | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 33.5 | 55.1 | +64.5% Kimi K3.1 Pro is 64.5% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $153.58 | $3,117.31 | +1929.8% Kimi K3.1 Pro is 20× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 6.76s | 59.28s | +776.9% Kimi K3.1 Pro is 776.9% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $1.00 / $5.00 | $2.00 / $10.0 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Kimi K3.1 Pro vs GPT-6.1 Terra (Non-reasoning): 64.5% more intelligence, 1929.8% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 776.9% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-6.1 Terra (Non-reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Max) scores 38.10 for $122.
- Kimi K3.1 Pro is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
GPT-6.1 Terra (Non-reasoning)Kimi K3.1 ProToday's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-1-terra-non-reasoning/kimi-k3-1-pro · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-1-terra-non-reasoning/kimi-k3-1-pro?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill