GPT-6.1 Terra (Non-reasoning) vs Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 (Reasoning)
Which is better for the money: GPT-6.1 Terra (Non-reasoning) by OpenAI or Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 (Reasoning) by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-27.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick GPT-6.1 Terra (Non-reasoning)
Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 (Reasoning) vs GPT-6.1 Terra (Non-reasoning): 62.1% less intelligence, 52.1% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 227.2% slower end-to-end.
| Metric | GPT-6.1 Terra (Non-reasoning) | Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 (Reasoning) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 33.5 | 12.7 | −62.1% Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 … is 62.1% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $153.58 | $233.56 | +52.1% Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 … is 52.1% more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 6.61s | 21.63s | +227.2% Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 … is 227.2% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $1.00 / $5.00 | $0.23 / $2.30 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-6.1 Terra (Non-reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Max) scores 38.10 for $122.
- Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 (Reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
GPT-6.1 Terra (Non-reasoning)Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 (Reasoning)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-1-terra-non-reasoning/qwen3-235b-a22b-instruct-2507-reasoning · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-1-terra-non-reasoning/qwen3-235b-a22b-instruct-2507-reasoning?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill