GPT-6.1 Terra (Non-reasoning) vs Qwen3.8 27B (Xhigh)
Which is better for the money: GPT-6.1 Terra (Non-reasoning) by OpenAI or Qwen3.8 27B (Xhigh) by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-27.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Qwen3.8 27B (Xhigh) scores 0.2 points higher (33.7 vs 33.5) but costs 9.5× as much to run the benchmark ($1459 vs $154; premium vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Qwen3.8 27B (Xhigh) when you need intelligence above 33.5, and GPT-6.1 Terra (Non-reasoning) when 33.5 is enough.
| Metric | GPT-6.1 Terra (Non-reasoning) | Qwen3.8 27B (Xhigh) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 33.5 | 33.7 | +0.6% Qwen3.8 27B (Xhigh) is 0.6% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $153.58 | $1,458.94 | +850.0% Qwen3.8 27B (Xhigh) is 9.5× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 6.61s | 64.02s | +868.5% Qwen3.8 27B (Xhigh) is 868.5% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $1.00 / $5.00 | $0.50 / $3.00 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image, Video |
Qwen3.8 27B (Xhigh) vs GPT-6.1 Terra (Non-reasoning): 0.6% more intelligence, 850.0% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 868.5% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-6.1 Terra (Non-reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Max) scores 38.10 for $122.
- Qwen3.8 27B (Xhigh) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
GPT-6.1 Terra (Non-reasoning)Qwen3.8 27B (Xhigh)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-1-terra-non-reasoning/qwen3-8-27b · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-1-terra-non-reasoning/qwen3-8-27b?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill