GPT-6.1 Terra (Xhigh) vs Ling 3.0 Flash
Which is better for the money: GPT-6.1 Terra (Xhigh) by OpenAI or Ling 3.0 Flash by InclusionAI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-27.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
GPT-6.1 Terra (Xhigh) scores 25.3 points higher (45.4 vs 20.1) but costs 4.1× as much to run the benchmark ($365 vs $89.8; both mid-range class). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick GPT-6.1 Terra (Xhigh) when you need intelligence above 20.1, and Ling 3.0 Flash when 20.1 is enough.
| Metric | GPT-6.1 Terra (Xhigh) | Ling 3.0 Flash | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 45.4 | 20.1 | −55.7% Ling 3.0 Flash is 55.7% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $364.95 | $89.77 | −75.4% Ling 3.0 Flash is 75.4% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 18.82s | 12.90s | −31.5% Ling 3.0 Flash is 31.5% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $1.00 / $5.00 | $0.07 / $0.22 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text |
Ling 3.0 Flash vs GPT-6.1 Terra (Xhigh): 55.7% less intelligence, 75.4% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 31.5% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-6.1 Terra (Xhigh) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium) scores 47.80 for $361.
- Ling 3.0 Flash is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Xhigh) scores 34.60 for $66.8.
GPT-6.1 Terra (Xhigh)Ling 3.0 FlashToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-1-terra-xhigh/ling-3-0-flash · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-1-terra-xhigh/ling-3-0-flash?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill