GPT-6.1 Terra (Max) vs MiniMax-M2.7
Which is better for the money: GPT-6.1 Terra (Max) by OpenAI or MiniMax-M2.7 by MiniMax? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-27.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
GPT-6.1 Terra (Max) scores 25.3 points higher (48.1 vs 22.8) but costs 3.7× as much to run the benchmark ($909 vs $243; premium vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick GPT-6.1 Terra (Max) when you need intelligence above 22.8, and MiniMax-M2.7 when 22.8 is enough.
| Metric | GPT-6.1 Terra (Max) | MiniMax-M2.7 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 48.1 | 22.8 | −52.6% MiniMax-M2.7 is 52.6% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $909.01 | $243.38 | −73.2% MiniMax-M2.7 is 73.2% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 83.46s | 53.78s | −35.6% MiniMax-M2.7 is 35.6% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $1.00 / $5.00 | $0.30 / $1.20 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text |
MiniMax-M2.7 vs GPT-6.1 Terra (Max): 52.6% less intelligence, 73.2% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 35.6% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-6.1 Terra (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) scores 51.00 for $662.
- MiniMax-M2.7 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
GPT-6.1 Terra (Max)MiniMax-M2.7Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-1-terra/minimax-m2-7 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-1-terra/minimax-m2-7?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill