GPT-6 Astra (High) vs Qwen3.5 397B A17B (Reasoning)
Which is better for the money: GPT-6 Astra (High) by OpenAI or Qwen3.5 397B A17B (Reasoning) by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-27.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
GPT-6 Astra (High) scores 32.5 points higher (50.9 vs 18.4) but costs 3.1× as much to run the benchmark ($2925 vs $941; flagship vs premium cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick GPT-6 Astra (High) when you need intelligence above 18.4, and Qwen3.5 397B A17B (Reasoning) when 18.4 is enough.
| Metric | GPT-6 Astra (High) | Qwen3.5 397B A17B (Reasoning) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 50.9 | 18.4 | −63.9% Qwen3.5 397B A17B (Re… is 63.9% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $2,925.01 | $940.97 | −67.8% Qwen3.5 397B A17B (Re… is 67.8% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 59.28s | 65.20s | +10.0% Qwen3.5 397B A17B (Re… is 10.0% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $10.0 / $50.0 | $0.60 / $3.60 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Qwen3.5 397B A17B (Reasoning) vs GPT-6 Astra (High): 63.9% less intelligence, 67.8% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 10.0% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-6 Astra (High) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Opus 5.5 (High, Default Fallback) scores 53.60 for $2172.
- Qwen3.5 397B A17B (Reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) scores 51.00 for $662.
GPT-6 Astra (High)Qwen3.5 397B A17B (Reasoning)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-astra-high/qwen3-5-397b-a17b · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-astra-high/qwen3-5-397b-a17b?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill