GPT-6 Astra (Low) vs Inkling 2 Small
Which is better for the money: GPT-6 Astra (Low) by OpenAI or Inkling 2 Small by Thinking Machines? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-11-06.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
GPT-6 Astra (Low) scores 12.7 points higher (43.3 vs 30.6) but costs 2.1× as much to run the benchmark ($1651 vs $792; both premium class). Pick GPT-6 Astra (Low) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Inkling 2 Small.
| Metric | GPT-6 Astra (Low) | Inkling 2 Small | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 43.3 | 30.6 | −29.3% Inkling 2 Small is 29.3% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $1,650.75 | $791.81 | −52.0% Inkling 2 Small is 52.0% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 15.43s | 20.92s | +35.6% Inkling 2 Small is 35.6% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $10.0 / $50.0 | $0.30 / $1.00 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Inkling 2 Small vs GPT-6 Astra (Low): 29.3% less intelligence, 52.0% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 35.6% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-6 Astra (Low) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 54.60 for $1124.
- Inkling 2 Small is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) scores 52.50 for $718.
GPT-6 Astra (Low)Inkling 2 SmallToday's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-astra-low/inkling-2-small · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-astra-low/inkling-2-small?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill