GPT-6 Luna (High) vs Qwen3.7 Plus
Which is better for the money: GPT-6 Luna (High) by OpenAI or Qwen3.7 Plus by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick GPT-6 Luna (High)
Qwen3.7 Plus vs GPT-6 Luna (High): 23.4% less intelligence, 793.9% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 260.3% slower end-to-end.
| Metric | GPT-6 Luna (High) | Qwen3.7 Plus | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 32.9 | 25.2 | −23.4% Qwen3.7 Plus is 23.4% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $47.85 | $427.73 | +793.9% Qwen3.7 Plus is 8.9× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 12.43s | 44.78s | +260.3% Qwen3.7 Plus is 260.3% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.10 / $0.50 | $0.40 / $1.60 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image, Video |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-6 Luna (High) is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
- Qwen3.7 Plus is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium) scores 47.80 for $361.
GPT-6 Luna (High)Qwen3.7 PlusToday's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-luna-high/qwen3-7-plus · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-luna-high/qwen3-7-plus?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill