GPT-6 Luna (Medium) vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
Which is better for the money: GPT-6 Luna (Medium) by OpenAI or MiniMax-M3.1-Flash by MiniMax? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
MiniMax-M3.1-Flash scores 12.8 points higher (42.7 vs 29.9) but costs 9.1× as much to run the benchmark ($283 vs $31.2; mid-range vs budget cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick MiniMax-M3.1-Flash when you need intelligence above 29.9, and GPT-6 Luna (Medium) when 29.9 is enough.
| Metric | GPT-6 Luna (Medium) | MiniMax-M3.1-Flash | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 29.9 | 42.7 | +42.8% MiniMax-M3.1-Flash is 42.8% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $31.17 | $283.18 | +808.5% MiniMax-M3.1-Flash is 9.1× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 8.25s | 25.34s | +207.2% MiniMax-M3.1-Flash is 207.2% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.10 / $0.50 | $0.15 / $0.60 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
MiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs GPT-6 Luna (Medium): 42.8% more intelligence, 808.5% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 207.2% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-6 Luna (Medium) is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
- MiniMax-M3.1-Flash is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
GPT-6 Luna (Medium)MiniMax-M3.1-FlashToday's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-luna-medium/minimax-m3-1-flash · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-luna-medium/minimax-m3-1-flash?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill