GPT-6 Luna (Non-reasoning) vs Beam 1.0
Which is better for the money: GPT-6 Luna (Non-reasoning) by OpenAI or Beam 1.0 by Reflection? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Beam 1.0 scores 11.8 points higher (30.3 vs 18.5) but costs 17× as much to run the benchmark ($319 vs $19.2; mid-range vs budget cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Beam 1.0 when you need intelligence above 18.5, and GPT-6 Luna (Non-reasoning) when 18.5 is enough.
| Metric | GPT-6 Luna (Non-reasoning) | Beam 1.0 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 18.5 | 30.3 | +63.8% Beam 1.0 is 63.8% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $19.16 | $318.73 | +1563.5% Beam 1.0 is 17× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 5.01s | 7.79s | +55.5% Beam 1.0 is 55.5% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.10 / $0.50 | $0.40 / $1.20 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text |
Beam 1.0 vs GPT-6 Luna (Non-reasoning): 63.8% more intelligence, 1563.5% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 55.5% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-6 Luna (Non-reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Low) scores 21.50 for $10.6.
- Beam 1.0 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
GPT-6 Luna (Non-reasoning)Beam 1.0Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-luna-non-reasoning/reflection-beam · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-luna-non-reasoning/reflection-beam?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill