GPT-6 Luna (Xhigh) vs Grok 4.7 (High)
Which is better for the money: GPT-6 Luna (Xhigh) by OpenAI or Grok 4.7 (High) by SpaceXAI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-26.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Grok 4.7 (High) scores 11.7 points higher (46.3 vs 34.6) but costs 58× as much to run the benchmark ($3881 vs $66.8; flagship vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Grok 4.7 (High) when you need intelligence above 34.6, and GPT-6 Luna (Xhigh) when 34.6 is enough.
| Metric | GPT-6 Luna (Xhigh) | Grok 4.7 (High) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 34.6 | 46.3 | +33.8% Grok 4.7 (High) is 33.8% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $66.81 | $3,880.88 | +5708.8% Grok 4.7 (High) is 58× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 28.32s | 51.53s | +82.0% Grok 4.7 (High) is 82.0% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.10 / $0.50 | $2.00 / $6.00 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Grok 4.7 (High) vs GPT-6 Luna (Xhigh): 33.8% more intelligence, 5708.8% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 82.0% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-6 Luna (Xhigh) is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
- Grok 4.7 (High) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Kimi K3.1 Pro scores 55.10 for $3117.
GPT-6 Luna (Xhigh)Grok 4.7 (High)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-luna-xhigh/grok-4-7-high · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-luna-xhigh/grok-4-7-high?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill