GPT-6 Luna (Xhigh) vs Hy3
Which is better for the money: GPT-6 Luna (Xhigh) by OpenAI or Hy3 by Tencent? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick GPT-6 Luna (Xhigh)
Hy3 vs GPT-6 Luna (Xhigh): 26.9% less intelligence, 123.9% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 56.5% slower end-to-end.
| Metric | GPT-6 Luna (Xhigh) | Hy3 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 34.6 | 25.3 | −26.9% Hy3 is 26.9% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $66.81 | $149.61 | +123.9% Hy3 is 2.2× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 21.27s | 33.29s | +56.5% Hy3 is 56.5% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.10 / $0.50 | $0.14 / $0.56 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-6 Luna (Xhigh) is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
- Hy3 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Max) scores 38.10 for $122.
GPT-6 Luna (Xhigh)Hy3Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-luna-xhigh/hy3 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-luna-xhigh/hy3?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill