GPT-6 Luna (Xhigh) vs Llama 4 Maverick
Which is better for the money: GPT-6 Luna (Xhigh) by OpenAI or Llama 4 Maverick by Meta? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-27.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
GPT-6 Luna (Xhigh) scores 25.3 points higher (34.6 vs 9.3) but costs 1.5× as much to run the benchmark ($66.8 vs $44.0; mid-range vs budget cost classes). Pick GPT-6 Luna (Xhigh) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Llama 4 Maverick.
| Metric | GPT-6 Luna (Xhigh) | Llama 4 Maverick | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 34.6 | 9.3 | −73.1% Llama 4 Maverick is 73.1% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $66.81 | $43.98 | −34.2% Llama 4 Maverick is 34.2% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 28.14s | 10.61s | −62.3% Llama 4 Maverick is 62.3% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.10 / $0.50 | $0.25 / $0.92 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Llama 4 Maverick vs GPT-6 Luna (Xhigh): 73.1% less intelligence, 34.2% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 62.3% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-6 Luna (Xhigh) is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
- Llama 4 Maverick is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Medium) scores 29.90 for $31.2.
GPT-6 Luna (Xhigh)Llama 4 MaverickToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-luna-xhigh/llama-4-maverick · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-luna-xhigh/llama-4-maverick?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill