GPT-6 Luna (Max) vs MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Reasoning)
Which is better for the money: GPT-6 Luna (Max) by OpenAI or MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Reasoning) by Xiaomi? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick GPT-6 Luna (Max)
MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Reasoning) vs GPT-6 Luna (Max): 31.8% less intelligence, 89.3% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 42.9% faster end-to-end.
| Metric | GPT-6 Luna (Max) | MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Reasoning) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 38.1 | 26.0 | −31.8% MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Reason… is 31.8% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $122.05 | $231.08 | +89.3% MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Reason… is 89.3% more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 86.79s | 49.53s | −42.9% MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Reason… is 42.9% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.10 / $0.50 | $0.41 / $1.02 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-6 Luna (Max) is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
- MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
GPT-6 Luna (Max)MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Reasoning)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-luna/mimo-v2-5-pro · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-luna/mimo-v2-5-pro?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill