GPT-6 Luna (Max) vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash
Which is better for the money: GPT-6 Luna (Max) by OpenAI or MiMo-V2.6-Flash by Xiaomi? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
GPT-6 Luna (Max) scores 0.2 points higher (38.1 vs 37.9) but costs 1.1× as much to run the benchmark ($122 vs $110; both mid-range class). Pick GPT-6 Luna (Max) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise MiMo-V2.6-Flash.
| Metric | GPT-6 Luna (Max) | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 38.1 | 37.9 | −0.5% MiMo-V2.6-Flash is 0.5% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $122.05 | $109.55 | −10.2% MiMo-V2.6-Flash is 10.2% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 82.02s | 49.53s | −39.6% MiMo-V2.6-Flash is 39.6% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.10 / $0.50 | $0.14 / $0.28 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
MiMo-V2.6-Flash vs GPT-6 Luna (Max): 0.5% less intelligence, 10.2% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 39.6% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-6 Luna (Max) is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
GPT-6 Luna (Max)MiMo-V2.6-FlashToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-luna/mimo-v2-6-flash · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-luna/mimo-v2-6-flash?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill