GPT-6 Luna (Max) vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
Which is better for the money: GPT-6 Luna (Max) by OpenAI or MiniMax-M3.1-Flash by MiniMax? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
MiniMax-M3.1-Flash scores 4.6 points higher (42.7 vs 38.1) but costs 2.3× as much to run the benchmark ($283 vs $122; both mid-range class). Pick MiniMax-M3.1-Flash when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise GPT-6 Luna (Max).
| Metric | GPT-6 Luna (Max) | MiniMax-M3.1-Flash | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 38.1 | 42.7 | +12.1% MiniMax-M3.1-Flash is 12.1% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $122.05 | $283.18 | +132.0% MiniMax-M3.1-Flash is 2.3× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 82.02s | 25.34s | −69.1% MiniMax-M3.1-Flash is 69.1% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.10 / $0.50 | $0.15 / $0.60 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
MiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs GPT-6 Luna (Max): 12.1% more intelligence, 132.0% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 69.1% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-6 Luna (Max) is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
- MiniMax-M3.1-Flash is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
GPT-6 Luna (Max)MiniMax-M3.1-FlashToday's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-luna/minimax-m3-1-flash · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-luna/minimax-m3-1-flash?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill