GPT-6 Sol (Non-reasoning) vs Hy3
Which is better for the money: GPT-6 Sol (Non-reasoning) by OpenAI or Hy3 by Tencent? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
GPT-6 Sol (Non-reasoning) scores 3.2 points higher (28.5 vs 25.3) but costs 3.0× as much to run the benchmark ($449 vs $150; both mid-range class). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick GPT-6 Sol (Non-reasoning) when you need intelligence above 25.3, and Hy3 when 25.3 is enough.
| Metric | GPT-6 Sol (Non-reasoning) | Hy3 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 28.5 | 25.3 | −11.2% Hy3 is 11.2% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $449.37 | $149.61 | −66.7% Hy3 is 66.7% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 6.01s | 33.29s | +453.9% Hy3 is 453.9% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $2.00 / $10.0 | $0.14 / $0.56 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text |
Hy3 vs GPT-6 Sol (Non-reasoning): 11.2% less intelligence, 66.7% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 453.9% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GPT-6 Sol (Non-reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium) scores 47.80 for $361.
- Hy3 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Max) scores 38.10 for $122.
GPT-6 Sol (Non-reasoning)Hy3Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-sol-non-reasoning/hy3 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-6-sol-non-reasoning/hy3?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill