gpt-oss-120b (High) vs Llama 4 Maverick
Which is better for the money: gpt-oss-120b (High) by OpenAI or Llama 4 Maverick by Meta? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-26.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
gpt-oss-120b (High) scores 2.3 points higher (11.6 vs 9.3) but costs 2.8× as much to run the benchmark ($123 vs $44.0; mid-range vs budget cost classes). Pick gpt-oss-120b (High) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Llama 4 Maverick.
| Metric | gpt-oss-120b (High) | Llama 4 Maverick | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 11.6 | 9.3 | −19.8% Llama 4 Maverick is 19.8% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $122.71 | $43.98 | −64.2% Llama 4 Maverick is 64.2% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 11.29s | 10.37s | −8.1% Llama 4 Maverick is 8.1% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.15 / $0.60 | $0.25 / $0.92 | |
| Input modalities | Text | Text, Image |
Llama 4 Maverick vs gpt-oss-120b (High): 19.8% less intelligence, 64.2% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 8.1% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- gpt-oss-120b (High) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Max) scores 38.10 for $122.
- Llama 4 Maverick is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Medium) scores 29.90 for $31.2.
gpt-oss-120b (High)Llama 4 MaverickToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-oss-120b/llama-4-maverick · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-oss-120b/llama-4-maverick?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill