gpt-oss-20b (High) vs Beam 1.0
Which is better for the money: gpt-oss-20b (High) by OpenAI or Beam 1.0 by Reflection? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Beam 1.0 scores 21.3 points higher (30.3 vs 9.0) but costs 11× as much to run the benchmark ($319 vs $28.8; mid-range vs budget cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Beam 1.0 when you need intelligence above 9.0, and gpt-oss-20b (High) when 9.0 is enough.
| Metric | gpt-oss-20b (High) | Beam 1.0 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 9.0 | 30.3 | +236.7% Beam 1.0 is 3.4× more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $28.81 | $318.73 | +1006.3% Beam 1.0 is 11× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 16.79s | 8.02s | −52.2% Beam 1.0 is 52.2% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.05 / $0.22 | $0.40 / $1.20 | |
| Input modalities | Text | Text |
Beam 1.0 vs gpt-oss-20b (High): 236.7% more intelligence, 1006.3% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 52.2% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- gpt-oss-20b (High) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Low) scores 21.50 for $10.6.
- Beam 1.0 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
gpt-oss-20b (High)Beam 1.0Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gpt-oss-20b/reflection-beam · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gpt-oss-20b/reflection-beam?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill