Granite 4.2 30B vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash
Which is better for the money: Granite 4.2 30B by IBM or MiMo-V2.6-Flash by Xiaomi? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick MiMo-V2.6-Flash
MiMo-V2.6-Flash vs Granite 4.2 30B: 198.4% more intelligence, 1.2% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 37.3% slower end-to-end.
| Metric | Granite 4.2 30B | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 12.7 | 37.9 | +198.4% MiMo-V2.6-Flash is 3.0× more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $110.83 | $109.55 | −1.2% MiMo-V2.6-Flash is 1.2% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 36.08s | 49.53s | +37.3% MiMo-V2.6-Flash is 37.3% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.16 / $0.65 | $0.14 / $0.28 | |
| Input modalities | Text | Text, Image |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Granite 4.2 30B is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Flash scores 37.90 for $110.
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
Granite 4.2 30BMiMo-V2.6-FlashToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/granite-4-2-30b/mimo-v2-6-flash · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/granite-4-2-30b/mimo-v2-6-flash?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill